This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Print Page | Contact Us | Your Cart | Sign In | Register
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   


View all (21) posts »

Historic Decision to Celebrate Pride

Posted By Administration, Wednesday, June 17, 2020

by Nathan Willner

NCBA Government Affairs Officer

It could not be more appropriate as those around our country celebrate Pride Month that the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) rendered its historic ruling on workplace discrimination.

In a 6-3 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, the SCOTUS held that gay and transgender employees can institute litigation against their employers under Title VII for discriminating against them because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlaws employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin.

While previously a majority of states permitted discrimination based on a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity, the ruling in this matter provides for actions to be brought under Title VII. 

The Court, in an opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, began its analysis by considering the definition of the word “sex.” The Court noted that Title VII prohibits taking certain actions “because of” sex, meaning “sex” can be one of multiple factors. 

Justice Gorsuch noted: “From the ordinary public meaning of the statute’s language at the time of the law’s adoption, a straightforward rule emerges: . . .  If the employer intentionally relies in part on an individual employee’s sex when deciding to discharge the employee—put differently, if changing the employee’s sex would have yielded a different choice by the employer—a statutory violation has occurred.” 

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote a lengthy dissenting opinion which Justice Clarence Thomas joined. Alito described the majority opinion as “legislation.” He noted that neither “sexual orientation” nor “gender identity” are listed in Title VII as grounds for prohibited discrimination. 

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a shorter, solo dissent opining that it is Congress’ and the President’s responsibility to amend Title VII, not the Court’s, but also applauded the hard work by the LGBTQ+ community.

National Creditors Bar Association is committed to diversity and inclusion and recently formed a Diversity & Inclusion Committee. If you are interested in joining, please reach out to


This post has not been tagged.

Permalink | Comments (0)

GDPR Compliance Statement:

This website is targeted only toward those located in the U.S. National Creditors Bar Association requests that individuals please refrain from sending personal information to the association while they are located in the European Union countries.



Contact US

© Copyright 2019 National Creditors Bar Association TM. All rights reserved.
Phone 202.861.0706
Email Us

National Creditors Bar Association

Washington, DC

Correspondence: National Creditors Bar Association National Office, 8043 Cooper Creek Blvd, Suite 206, University Park, FL 34201